WI: Sex offenders who are homeless would have to wear GPS monitors under Republican bill

Source: wpr.org 12/22/25

Legislation comes as 7th US Circuit Court of Appeals considers constitutionality of Wisconsin’s GPS requirement for repeat sex offenders

 

Several Republican legislators say they want to close a “gap” in the state’s sex offender registry law they contend leaves communities in the dark about the whereabouts of convicted offenders who are homeless.

The bill would require any registered sex offender in Wisconsin to wear a GPS ankle monitor unless they can provide a permanent address. In prepared remarks before the Senate Committee on Judiciary and Public Safety, state Sen. Cory Tomczyk, R-Mosinee, said it would create a uniform standard.

“(The bill) is not meant to demonize a portion of the population just because they are homeless,” Maxey said. “This bill is meant to keep Wisconsin’s communities safe.”

Tomczyk claimed 16 percent of “Wisconsin’s homeless are sex offenders,” citing an April study by the Cicero Institute think tank, whose founder has criticized the “Homeless Industrial Complex.” Tomczyk said if the group’s estimate is correct, that means homeless sex offenders “are out and about in communities with no accountability” to the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, and other residents don’t know where they are.

“This bill ensures that housing status does not create a blind …

Read the full article

 

Related posts

Subscribe
Notify of

If you are feeling extremely depressed and possibly even suicidal, please call or text 988 (suicide hotline) or any loved one who you believe is immediately available. If you feel depressed and in need of a friendly community and unbiased emotional support, you can email Alex and Marty at emotionalsupportgroup@all4consolaws.org

 

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  1. Submissions must be in English
  2. Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  3. Please keep the tone of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  4. Swear words should be starred out such as f*k and s*t and a**
  5. Please avoid the use of derogatory labels.  Always use person-first language.
  6. Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  7. Please refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  8. Please take personal conversations off this forum.
  9. We will not publish any comments advocating for violent or any illegal action.
  10. We cannot connect participants privately - feel free to leave your contact info here. You may want to create a new / free, readily available email address that are not personally identifiable.
  11. Please refrain from copying and pasting repetitive and lengthy amounts of text.
  12. Please do not post in all Caps.
  13. If you wish to link to a serious and relevant media article, legitimate advocacy group or other pertinent web site / document, please provide the full link. No abbreviated / obfuscated links. Posts that include a URL may take considerably longer to be approved.
  14. We suggest to compose lengthy comments in a desktop text editor and copy and paste them into the comment form
  15. We will not publish any posts containing any names not mentioned in the original article.
  16. Please choose a short user name that does not contain links to other web sites or identify real people.  Do not use your real name.
  17. Please do not solicit funds
  18. No discussions about weapons
  19. If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), Person Forced to Register (PFR) or any others, the first time you use it in a thread, please expand it for new people to better understand.
  20. All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them.  It will not be displayed on the site.
  21. Please send any input regarding moderation or other website issues via email to moderator [at] all4consolaws [dot] org
  22. We no longer post articles about arrests or accusations, only selected convictions. If your comment contains a link to an arrest or accusation article we will not approve your comment.
  23. If addressing another commenter, please address them by exactly their full display name, do not modify or abbreviate their name. 
  24. Please check for typos, spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors before submitting.  Comments that have many errors will not be approved. 
ACSOL, including but not limited to its board members and agents, does not provide legal advice on this website.  In addition, ACSOL warns that those who provide comments on this website may or may not be legal professionals on whose advice one can reasonably rely.  
 

17 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

In response to the numerous sex crimes committed by homeless registrants, I’m sure.

And exactly how are homeless registrants expected to pay for such monitors and monitoring and keep them charged?

Or is this their answer to the homeless registrant problem – giving them a reason to lock them back up?

Right now the state is charging $240 a month. And they collect my state income refund every year to cover the amount I owe. The state can’t do anything to me if I don’t pay. Imagine being homeless and not able to charge the bracelet. Being not on any supervision, I charge it when I want. It dies a couple times a week. The DOC monitoring calls me a couple times a week and asks me to charge it. Interesting how “not punishment” the bracelet is, and the department of corrections runs the program!?!? Interesting they know exactly how much of the homeless is S.O., but they probably can’t cite how many are offending being homeless. I can, probably zero percent!!!!

I believe that this would be an Equal Protection Clause violation because you are not putting monitors on the domiciled people forced to register but just homeless (that the courts and the government help to put out there).

I’m not saying they don’t put ankle monitors on their people, but when you do a one-to-one protection, they are supposed to be the same.

This is the future, this is why a tiered registry was invented. This is why people in tier one are not listed, this is America moving forward. They wanna minimize the public access to who’s who and just throw a GPS monitor on everybody who’s tier 3 that’s what the Internet technologies has come to, hey don’t need the public awareness anymore. It used to be a tool for the public to know and help harass people on Megan’s Law but with today’s technology it’s easer to just GPS everybody and call it a day.

Those in Madison should put monitors on themselves and mushroom meters when they think about to do to citizens convicted of sex crimes. Once a cheese wedge, always wedging their way into every fiber of society.

It seems like sometimes Wisconsin is worse than Florida in some aspects. ( Florida resident here)

“The bill) is not meant to demonize” – Except, that’s EXACTLY what it does

“The registry is not meant to be punishment” – Except, that’s EXACTLY what it does.

“This bill is meant to keep Wisconsin’s communities safe.” – Except, that’s EXACTLY what will never transpire.

What the hell are these idiots thinking? Do they really think they’re not gonna cut those off? Get real.

Yet another solution in search of a problem.

Cruel, mean, dumb, vindictive–not much more I can say about those politicians in Wisconsin

They tried this in CA a number of years ago. Of course the homeless can’t pay, so the state would have to. Once they calculated the unfeasible cost it died out. So put out info to the residents of what this will cost.

The laws in FL are what creates the SO homeless crisis. Imagine if they allowed these people to live somewhere.